DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD STE QDRRECTION OF NAVA RECORDS
704 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100°
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
a DIC
Docket No. 10002-+-12
14 Aug 13
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on
13 August 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures >
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 14 June
2013, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
thig connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished wpon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it igs important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Direc
Executive
Enclosure: NPC Memo dtd 14 Jun 13
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2400 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 1 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5648 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/241 dated 12 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0430-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2348-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/129 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5257 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 17 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0746-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/131 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4761 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 23 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1750-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ¢ September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2848 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 5 November 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.